Key Takeaways
- All-on-6 in Turkey costs 5,500–12,000 EUR per jaw depending on implant brand and prosthesis material. The same procedure costs 14,000–28,000 EUR in the UK or Germany — savings of 55–70%.
- All-on-6 uses 6 implants per arch vs 4 in All-on-4. The extra 2 implants distribute bite force across more contact points, making it preferred for the upper jaw where bone density is lower.
- All-on-6 costs approximately 1,500–3,000 EUR more per jaw than All-on-4 in Turkey. The additional implants increase surgery time by 45–60 minutes.
- Full mouth All-on-6 (both jaws) in Turkey: 11,000–24,000 EUR total. Same in UK/Germany: 28,000–56,000 EUR.
- Treatment requires two visits 3–6 months apart. A temporary fixed prosthesis is fitted on the day of surgery.
All-on-6 Turkey
Western Europe
survival rate*
required
*Meta-analysis, J Oral Implantol 2023. Applies to full-arch implant protocols broadly.
All-on-6 is a full-arch dental implant protocol where an entire set of fixed teeth — typically 10–14 teeth per arch — is supported by six dental implants per jaw. Four implants are placed vertically in the anterior (front) region of the jaw; two posterior implants are angled at 30–45 degrees to avoid the maxillary sinus in the upper jaw or the inferior alveolar canal in the lower jaw. The additional two implants compared to the All-on-4 protocol increase total bone-to-implant contact area by approximately 30–50% and distribute masticatory (chewing) forces across more support points, providing greater structural redundancy for the prosthesis.
All-on-6 vs All-on-4: The Key Differences
Both All-on-4 and All-on-6 are full-arch fixed implant protocols — both replace all teeth in a jaw with a fixed bridge supported by implants, and both use the immediate loading approach where a temporary prosthesis is fitted on the day of surgery. The fundamental difference is the number of implants and where they are placed.
The All-on-4 protocol was designed by Dr. Paulo Malo specifically for patients with reduced bone volume in the posterior jaw. By angling the two rear implants at 30–45 degrees, the surgeon engages denser anterior bone while sidestepping anatomical obstacles like the maxillary sinus (upper jaw) and the inferior alveolar nerve (lower jaw). This allows All-on-4 to work in jaws where placing six or more straight implants would be impossible without bone grafting.
All-on-6 uses six implants and places them across a wider span of the jaw. The four anterior implants are vertical; the two posterior implants are still angled to avoid anatomical structures, but the overall distribution of implants is broader. This distributes the load of the prosthesis across more contact points and provides redundancy — if one implant fails, the remaining five can still support the bridge. In an All-on-4, every single implant is critical to the prosthesis.
All-on-6 is particularly advantageous for the upper jaw (maxilla). The maxillary bone is cancellous (spongy) and significantly less dense than the mandibular (lower jaw) bone. The Nobel Biocare All-on-4 concept was originally validated primarily for the mandible. Many oral surgeons recommend All-on-6 for upper jaw cases, particularly where bone resorption is moderate-to-severe, because the additional implants compensate for lower bone density by increasing total osseointegration surface area. See the Upper Jaw Advantage section below for a detailed explanation.
All-on-6 Turkey Cost: Per-Arch Price Breakdown (2026)
All-on-6 turkey cost depends on two main variables: the implant brand and the prosthesis material. The following pricing is based on market research of published Turkish dental clinic pricing and European dental association fee guides (2025–2026). Prices are per single jaw (upper or lower arch) and include the implants, abutments, temporary prosthesis, and final prosthesis unless stated otherwise.
All-on-6 Turkey Cost Per Arch — 3-Tier Comparison (2026)
| Tier | Implant Brand | Prosthesis | Turkey / Arch | UK / Arch | Germany / Arch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget | Korean brands (Osstem, MegaGen) | Acrylic reinforced | €5,500–7,000 | £15,000–18,000 | €16,000–20,000 |
| Mid-Range | German brands (Camlog, Ankylos) | Monolithic Zirconia | €7,000–9,500 | £18,000–23,000 | €20,000–26,000 |
| Premium | Straumann / Nobel Biocare | Full Zirconia CAD/CAM | €9,500–12,000 | £22,000–28,000 | €24,000–30,000 |
Source: Market research of published Turkish dental clinic pricing and European dental association fee guides, 2025–2026. Prices per arch.
Compared to All-on-4 pricing in Turkey (4,000–9,000 EUR per arch), All-on-6 costs approximately 1,500–3,000 EUR more per jaw. This premium reflects the two additional implant fixtures, extended surgery time of approximately 45–60 extra minutes, and the additional abutment hardware required for a 6-implant bridge connection. The prosthesis itself costs the same whether it is supported by 4 or 6 implants, so the cost difference between All-on-4 and All-on-6 is almost entirely attributable to the implant components and surgical time.
What Is Typically Included
- Included in a Complete All-on-6 Package
- 6 dental implants (fixture + abutment) per arch
- Multi-unit abutments for the prosthesis connection
- Consultation, 3D CBCT scan, and treatment planning
- Local anaesthesia or IV sedation for surgery
- Temporary fixed acrylic prosthesis (fitted on surgery day)
- Permanent prosthesis (acrylic or zirconia, fitted at Visit 2)
- All follow-up appointments during both visits
- Post-operative medications (antibiotics, pain relief, mouth rinse)
- Implant passport with brand, model, and serial numbers
- Usually Billed Separately (Ask Before Booking)
- Tooth extractions: 30–100 EUR per tooth if not included in the package
- Bone grafting: 150–800 EUR per site if bone volume is insufficient
- IV sedation upgrade: 200–400 EUR if not included
- Hotel accommodation and airport transfers — some premium packages include these
All-on-6 vs All-on-4 vs All-on-8: Decision Matrix
All three protocols replace all teeth in a jaw with a fixed implant-supported bridge. The number of implants determines bone requirements, load distribution, surgery duration, and cost. This decision matrix covers the clinically relevant differences to help you understand which option your surgeon may recommend based on your CBCT scan findings.
Full-Arch Implant Comparison: All-on-4 vs All-on-6 vs All-on-8
| Feature | All-on-4 | All-on-6 | All-on-8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implants per arch | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Cost Turkey (per arch) | €4,000–9,000 | €5,500–12,000 | €7,000–14,000 |
| Bone requirement | Moderate | Good | Good–Excellent |
| Angled implants | 2 posterior | 2 posterior | Varies by anatomy |
| Bone graft usually needed | No | No | Sometimes |
| Best jaw | Lower jaw | Upper jaw | Both (maximum cases) |
| Bite force distribution | 4 contact points | 6 contact points | 8 contact points |
| Surgery duration | 90–120 min | 135–165 min | 150–210 min |
| Ideal for | Moderate bone loss, lower jaw | Upper jaw, good bone volume | Maximum stability, heavy bite |
| Prosthesis teeth | 10–12 per arch | 12–14 per arch | 12–16 per arch |
When to Choose All-on-6 Over All-on-4
The choice between All-on-4 and All-on-6 should be made by your oral surgeon based on your CBCT scan — not personal preference or budget alone. That said, the following clinical indicators tend to favour All-on-6:
- Upper jaw treatment (maxilla): the spongy cancellous bone of the upper jaw benefits from 6 implant contact points rather than 4
- Heavier bite force or a documented history of bruxism (teeth grinding) that puts extra load on the prosthesis framework
- Wider jaw anatomy with sufficient bone height and width to accommodate 6 implants without crowding
- CT scan shows good bone volume in the posterior region, making vertical implant placement viable
- Patient preference for maximum structural redundancy — the prosthesis can tolerate an implant failure more easily with 6 supports than with 4
- Patients seeking zirconia all on 6 Turkey as a long-term investment and wanting every structural advantage for the final bridge
Turkey vs. Europe: All-on-6 Price Comparison
The following comparison shows the full range of All-on-6 cost per arch across different countries. All figures represent mid-point estimates based on publicly available clinic pricing data and dental association guides. Turkey prices reflect our market research of Turkish dental clinic fee schedules from 2025–2026.
All-on-6 Cost Per Arch — Country Comparison
The price difference is driven by significantly lower overhead costs in Turkey — labour, clinic rent, dental technician fees — not by lower material quality. Premium-tier Turkish clinics use the same implant brands and CAD/CAM milling systems as European clinics. Straumann SLActive implants cost the same to purchase whether placed in Munich or Antalya. The saving is structural, not material. This is consistently the finding of dental health economists who have studied the Turkish dental tourism market, and it explains why the savings hold even in the premium tier. You can read more about implant brands available in Turkey in our dedicated guide.
Implant Brands Used for All-on-6 in Turkey
Turkish dental clinics source implants from both global premium manufacturers and well-established cost-efficient brands. The implant brand is one of the most important factors in your All-on-6 treatment — it determines the quality of the implant surface technology, the availability of long-term clinical data, and the ease of future maintenance at a dentist in your home country. Always ask for your implant passport documenting the brand, model, and lot number of every implant placed. A detailed implant brands guide is also available on this site.
Implant Brands Available for All-on-6 in Turkey
| Brand | Origin | Key Technology | Tier | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Straumann | Switzerland | SLActive surface, BLX/BLT | Premium | 30+ years clinical data, widely cited in peer-reviewed literature |
| Nobel Biocare | Sweden | Brånemark System, Replace Select, TiUnite surface | Premium | Original All-on-4 developer; the benchmark brand for full-arch cases |
| Osstem | South Korea | TS/SS/US series, 3rd largest globally by volume | Budget | ISO 13485 certified, 20+ years of data, widely used across Turkish clinics |
| MegaGen | South Korea | AnyRidge, AnyOne, internal hex system | Budget | Strong track record in Asia; increasingly used in Europe. Cost-efficient. |
| Camlog | Germany / Switzerland | CAMLOG/CONELOG, Promote surface | Mid-Range | German engineering precision; popular with German-speaking patients |
| BioHorizons | USA | Laser-Lok surface technology | Mid-Range | Strong soft tissue integration data; well documented in US literature |
| MIS Implants | Israel | V3/C1 series, internal hex | Budget | Cost-efficient option with reasonable survival data; ISO 13485 |
Before surgery, ask the clinic to show you the sealed, sterile packaging for each implant. Implant boxes carry the brand name, model number, diameter, length, and lot number. Photograph these boxes — this information goes into your implant passport and is essential for any future dental work, warranty claims, or emergency treatment at a dentist in your home country.
Why All-on-6 Is Preferred for the Upper Jaw
The upper jaw (maxilla) and lower jaw (mandible) are anatomically and structurally different. Understanding this difference explains why many oral surgeons recommend All-on-6 for maxillary cases when All-on-4 might suffice for the lower jaw.
"Upper jaw bone density is typically 30–40% lower than lower jaw bone. This is why many surgeons prefer All-on-6 for maxillary cases — the additional 2 implants compensate for the lower density by increasing total osseointegration surface area."
The mandible (lower jaw) is primarily composed of dense cortical bone, which offers strong anchorage and high implant stability quotient (ISQ) values — typically in the range of 70–85. The maxilla (upper jaw), particularly in the posterior region, is predominantly cancellous (spongy) bone with a cortical bone shell that is often thin. ISQ values in the maxilla tend to be lower — commonly in the 55–70 range — especially in patients who have experienced bone resorption following tooth loss.
Lower ISQ values in the maxilla mean that each individual implant has less initial stability compared to a mandibular implant. Adding 2 extra implants in All-on-6 compensates for this by increasing the total number of bone-to-implant contact points and spreading the immediate load more widely. This is particularly important in the first weeks after surgery, before osseointegration has fully occurred, when the temporary prosthesis is in function and placing cyclical loads on the implants.
The Nobel Biocare All-on-4 Treatment Concept was originally conceived and validated primarily for the mandible. While All-on-4 is used successfully in the upper jaw — particularly when bone quality is good — many surgeons with high-volume full-arch experience prefer All-on-6 for maxillary cases in patients with moderate-to-severe bone resorption. The additional two implants serve as a biological safety margin.
The Practical Implication for Dental Tourists
If you need full-arch treatment on both jaws and your surgeon recommends All-on-4 for the lower jaw but All-on-6 for the upper jaw, this is not upselling — it is a clinically sound differentiation based on the structural differences between the two jaw types. A combined protocol (All-on-4 lower + All-on-6 upper) costs approximately 9,500–20,500 EUR in Turkey depending on implant brands and prosthesis materials, compared to 24,000–53,000 EUR for the same combination in the UK or Germany.
The only reliable way to determine which protocol is appropriate for your jaw is a 3D CBCT scan. Remote consultations with Turkish clinics are possible once you have this scan from your home dentist (typically 80–150 EUR). Multiple Turkish clinics can review the same scan file and provide treatment recommendations before you book any flights.
All-on-6 Two-Visit Surgery Timeline
All-on-6 in Turkey requires two visits separated by 3–6 months. The first visit covers surgery and temporary prosthesis fitting; the second visit delivers the permanent bridge after osseointegration. This is not a Turkish protocol — it is the global clinical standard for full-arch implant treatment. No reputable surgeon will place a permanent heavy zirconia bridge on the day of surgery before osseointegration has occurred.
All-on-6 Treatment Timeline
Acrylic vs Zirconia Prosthesis for All-on-6
The prosthesis material is the largest single cost variable in All-on-6 turkey cost after the implant brand. The choice of material affects the price, lifespan, aesthetics, and maintenance requirements of your final bridge. There are four main options, each with different trade-offs.
Acrylic (PMMA) Prosthesis
Budget LighterCost saving: 2,000–4,000 EUR per arch less than zirconia
Lifespan: 5–10 years before replacement needed
Strength: 80–120 MPa flexural strength
Advantage: Lighter weight reduces stress on implants during healing; easier to repair if chipped
Downside: Stains over time from coffee and red wine; less fracture-resistant than zirconia
Best for: Initial/temporary restoration, budget-conscious patients, older patients who prioritise function over longevity
Monolithic Zirconia Prosthesis
Premium Long-lastingAdditional cost: 3,000–5,000 EUR more per arch vs acrylic
Lifespan: 15–25 years with proper maintenance
Strength: 1,000+ MPa flexural strength — approximately 8–10x stronger than acrylic
Aesthetics: Natural translucency, highly polished, stain-resistant surface
Best for: Long-term investment, heavy bite force patients, patients under 65 wanting a permanent solution
Hybrid (Zirconia Frame + Composite Teeth)
Mid-Range FlexibleCost: Mid-range between acrylic and full zirconia
Lifespan: 10–15 years
Structure: Zirconia framework provides structural strength; composite resin teeth are bonded on top
Advantage: Individual teeth can be replaced if chipped without fabricating an entirely new bridge
Consideration: Composite teeth wear faster than full zirconia and may need polishing or replacement over time
PEEK (Polymer) Framework
Mid-Range Metal-FreeCost: Mid-range, similar to hybrid options
Key advantage: Lightweight, completely metal-free, suitable for patients with titanium sensitivity concerns (note: the implants themselves are titanium)
Lifespan: Less long-term clinical data available than zirconia; typically 8–15 years
Consideration: PEEK has good shock-absorption properties which may benefit the implant-bone interface under heavy chewing loads
A common and financially sensible strategy: request an acrylic temporary prosthesis during the healing phase (Visit 1), then decide on the permanent material at Visit 2 after experiencing how the bite feels. Some clinics allow an upgrade to zirconia between visits at a predetermined cost, which is worth confirming before signing the treatment agreement.
Full Mouth All-on-6: Both Jaws Cost Breakdown
Many patients require full mouth All-on-6 treatment on both the upper and lower jaw. The table below shows the total treatment cost for dual-arch All-on-6 in Turkey versus Western Europe, across three material tiers. Turkish clinics typically offer a dual-arch discount of 500–1,500 EUR when both jaws are treated during the same visits.
Full Mouth All-on-6 (Both Jaws) — Cost Comparison
| Combination | Turkey Total | UK Total | Germany Total | Approx. Saving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Both jaws acrylic (budget implants) | €11,000–14,000 | £30,000–36,000 | €32,000–40,000 | ~70% |
| Both jaws zirconia (mid-range implants) | €14,000–19,000 | £36,000–46,000 | €40,000–52,000 | ~65% |
| Both jaws zirconia (premium implants) | €19,000–24,000 | £44,000–56,000 | €48,000–60,000 | ~60% |
Turkey prices include dual-arch discount where applicable. UK/Germany figures based on published dental association fee guidance 2025–2026. Travel not included in any figure.
Adding travel costs for two trips — approximately 1,500–3,000 EUR including return flights, 5–7 nights accommodation per visit, and daily expenses — the total cost of full mouth All-on-6 in Turkey ranges from approximately 12,500–27,000 EUR all-in. This compares with 28,000–60,000 EUR for the equivalent treatment in Western Europe without any travel costs. The absolute savings of 15,000–35,000 EUR are the fundamental economic driver of dental tourism for full-arch cases.
Honest Considerations Before Choosing All-on-6 in Turkey
This guide focuses on the clinical and financial case for All-on-6 Turkey treatment. But any honest assessment must also address the real considerations and risks that dental tourists need to factor into their decision.
- All-on-6 is not reversible. Once natural teeth are extracted and implants placed, this decision is permanent. No implant treatment should be approached as something easily undone.
- Distance complicates complications. If an infection, implant loosening, or prosthesis fracture occurs after you fly home, you cannot walk back into the clinic. Find a local dentist willing to provide emergency support for implants placed abroad before you travel — not after.
- Travel insurance with dental emergency coverage is recommended for all dental tourists. Several UK and German insurers offer policies covering complications from elective dental procedures abroad.
- The 3-month soft diet is not optional. No hard foods, no crunchy foods, no chewy foods for at least 3 months post-surgery. Patients who cannot commit to this risk micro-movement of implants during osseointegration, which can lead to implant failure.
- A 3D CBCT scan before treatment is mandatory — not optional. No responsible surgeon should place 6 implants without first assessing bone volume and anatomy in three dimensions. If a clinic quotes you without requesting a CBCT scan first, this is a warning sign.
- Warranty enforcement across borders requires planning. Get warranty terms in writing. Understand whether the warranty requires you to return to Turkey (at your own expense) to claim it, and what the warranty actually covers: the implants, the prosthesis, or both.
Implant failure rate in Turkey is not higher than in Europe when accredited clinics and premium brands are used. The key variable is clinic quality, not country. Turkey has dental clinics accredited by JCI (Joint Commission International), and many Turkish oral surgeons completed post-graduate training at European universities. However, Turkey's dental tourism market also includes clinics operating at the very bottom of the quality spectrum. Choosing on price alone is the primary risk factor for dental tourism — not geography.
Summary: Key Takeaways
- All-on-6 Turkey cost ranges from 5,500–12,000 EUR per arch depending on implant brand (Korean vs German vs Swiss/Swedish) and prosthesis material (acrylic vs zirconia). Both jaws total: 11,000–24,000 EUR.
- All-on-6 uses 6 implants per arch vs 4 in All-on-4. The additional implants increase total osseointegration surface area by ~30–50% and make it the preferred protocol for the upper jaw where bone density is 30–40% lower than the mandible.
- The price difference between All-on-4 and All-on-6 in Turkey is approximately 1,500–3,000 EUR per arch — almost entirely attributable to the two extra implant fixtures and extended surgery time of 45–60 minutes.
- Premium-tier Turkish clinics use the same Straumann and Nobel Biocare implants as UK and German clinics. The cost difference is structural (lower overhead) not material.
- Treatment requires two visits to Turkey separated by 3–6 months for osseointegration. This is a biological necessity of full-arch implant treatment worldwide, not a Turkish commercial choice.
Frequently Asked Questions About All-on-6 in Turkey
Evidence-based answers to the most common questions about all on 6 turkey cost, implant brands, protocols, and dental tourism logistics.
Ready to Explore All-on-6 in Antalya?
I live here, I’ve had dental implants myself, and I help patients find the right clinic and get a proper treatment plan — at no cost to you. Send me a WhatsApp message and I’ll send you a personalised cost breakdown within 24 hours.
Get a Free Treatment Plan on WhatsAppIndependent dental tourism research from Antalya. No clinic commissions.
Sources & References
All statistics and clinical data referenced in this article are sourced from the following:
- smile-antalya.com (2026). "Turkish Dental Clinic All-on-6 Price Market Research." Based on publicly published clinic fee schedules and dental tourism portal pricing, 2025–2026.
- Malo P, et al. (2011). "A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up." J Am Dent Assoc, 142(3):310-20. PubMed.
- Pjetursson BE, et al. (2012). "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses." Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(Suppl 6):163-201. PubMed.
- Moraschini V, et al. (2015). "Implant survival rates, marginal bone levels and complications in full-mouth rehabilitation." J Oral Rehabil, 42(12):956-72. PubMed.
- Meta-analysis on full-arch implant survival. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023. Referenced for 98.1% five-year survival statistic.
- Nobel Biocare — All-on-4 Treatment Concept Clinical Documentation.
- Straumann AG — Implant Systems & SLActive Clinical Data.
- Joint Commission International (JCI) — Accredited Organizations Directory.
- Osstem Implant Co. — ISO 13485 certification and clinical documentation. osstem.com.
- Camlog Biotechnologies — CAMLOG/CONELOG implant system clinical data. camlog.com.